|
|
Non state justice systems & pluralism of law
Ivančo, Alex
The theme of this thesis is the assessment of the prerequisites for the pluralism of law and non-state justice systems to improve the possibilities of solving disputes in society. The main research question is whether non-state justice systems fulfil a social role in providing justice. The thesis should offer a descriptive analysis of the concept of legal pluralism and methodological procedures for the inclusion of non-state justice systems in the state. The outcome of the work should be an overview of the possibilities of interaction between different legal systems, whether formal or customary, of the different ways of resolving disputes in this environment, and of the contribution of such proposals to the reform of the legal environment that count on the real situation in society. This work will first deal with a descriptive analysis of the concept of legal pluralism in the professional discourse and its relation to the outlined topic, then compare the methods and procedures of legal pluralism, respectively the functioning of non-state justice systems, and finally summarize the implications of the analytical concept of legal pluralism for planning and improvement of the legal environment. In addition, the work will focus on examining the implications of the different approaches in the relationship...
|
|
|
Non state justice systems & pluralism of law
Ivančo, Alex
The theme of this thesis is the assessment of the prerequisites for the pluralism of law and non-state justice systems to improve the possibilities of solving disputes in society. The main research question is whether non-state justice systems fulfil a social role in providing justice. The thesis should offer a descriptive analysis of the concept of legal pluralism and methodological procedures for the inclusion of non-state justice systems in the state. The outcome of the work should be an overview of the possibilities of interaction between different legal systems, whether formal or customary, of the different ways of resolving disputes in this environment, and of the contribution of such proposals to the reform of the legal environment that count on the real situation in society. This work will first deal with a descriptive analysis of the concept of legal pluralism in the professional discourse and its relation to the outlined topic, then compare the methods and procedures of legal pluralism, respectively the functioning of non-state justice systems, and finally summarize the implications of the analytical concept of legal pluralism for planning and improvement of the legal environment. In addition, the work will focus on examining the implications of the different approaches in the relationship...
|
|
|
Non state justice systems & pluralism of law
Ivančo, Alex ; Kühn, Zdeněk (advisor) ; Maršálek, Pavel (referee) ; Holländer, Pavol (referee)
The theme of this thesis is the assessment of the prerequisites for the pluralism of law and non-state justice systems to improve the possibilities of solving disputes in society. The main research question is whether non-state justice systems fulfil a social role in providing justice. The thesis should offer a descriptive analysis of the concept of legal pluralism and methodological procedures for the inclusion of non-state justice systems in the state. The outcome of the work should be an overview of the possibilities of interaction between different legal systems, whether formal or customary, of the different ways of resolving disputes in this environment, and of the contribution of such proposals to the reform of the legal environment that count on the real situation in society. The thesis of procedural pluralism and participatory methods of solving disputes that have a user, a citizen in the center of these systems is offered as a starting point for new designs. The final part of the work will therefore explore current approaches to improving legal systems that aim to increase participation of user based on their needs, and will include some cases for comparing individual programs to improve legal systems.
|
guest ::
